Picture
Make: Canon
Model: Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Shutter Speed: 1/5 second
F Number: F/1.8
ISO Speed: 100
Date Picture Taken: Apr 21, 2008, 9:07:46 PM
Artist's Comments
I really want to know what you think. Any comments not giving any constructive comment will be DELETED... Or at least hidden.
EXIF data which would not be visible is: f/3 ish...hard to tell 135mm
Not sure what you were trying to achieve, but I don't like it technically. The blown-out highlight together with the extremely over-processed nature of the noise is distracting. I also can't make out the subject matter?
The overall "look" successfully looks like an interesting old photograph, but I think it'd work better with better subject matter and better exposure. And a tad less noise.
I think you're right really... this is not such a good example of what I was doing...just one of them which came out in focus.
What I was working on here, was having the lens not actually on the body of the camera. I was using a 135mm Pentax lens (would be larger though due to multiplication factor of digital CCDs) which naturally wouldn't fit the mount of my canon.
Additionally, I went a bit overboard with post working the RAW file which explains the odd nature of the light dark and noise.
The actual subject matter here is the bottom of a vase and a clay pomegranate. The full view is on the other one, [link] . Like in this one, the lens is not actually on the body so I got a different focus, and possible it is that the RAW was over-processed.
I'll keep this in mind when I try this sort of thing again.
--
"I get my ideas from a smallish troll that lives in the crawlspace under my apartment."
Don't think this is just another news article with the usual love deviations that have already hundreds of favorites! All of these deviations don't have even 100 favorites & they're the best!
Please watch them closely and show your appreciation! @
`karemelancholia is one of the most genuine deviants you could ever met. Always active and a true deviantART cheerleader and supporter in every aspect. You can always count on her to lend a hand or get involved, and you usually will find her doing large amounts of both at any given moment. She's consistently reports on contests around dA, showcases the efforts of her fellow artists and shows her charitable side through various activities. Besides all of this, she's a truly talented artist which is why she's an obvious choice for deviousness this month. Read More
Devious Comments
The overall "look" successfully looks like an interesting old photograph, but I think it'd work better with better subject matter and better exposure. And a tad less noise.
What I was working on here, was having the lens not actually on the body of the camera. I was using a 135mm Pentax lens (would be larger though due to multiplication factor of digital CCDs) which naturally wouldn't fit the mount of my canon.
Additionally, I went a bit overboard with post working the RAW file which explains the odd nature of the light dark and noise.
The actual subject matter here is the bottom of a vase and a clay pomegranate. The full view is on the other one, [link] . Like in this one, the lens is not actually on the body so I got a different focus, and possible it is that the RAW was over-processed.
I'll keep this in mind when I try this sort of thing again.
--
"I get my ideas from a smallish troll that lives in the crawlspace under my apartment."
Previous PageNext Page